I use a writing tool that allows me to create RAG knowledge bases. I use these knowledge bases to have "experts" critique my writing.
For example, I have a "Dave Snowden" knowledge base where I've cribbed dozens of Dave's YouTube videos. When I'm writing about problem-solving in complex adaptive systems, I may ask the LLM "How might Dave Snowden critique these paragraphs?" or ""How might Dave Snowden clarify this concept?". Usually, I get a useful response that helps me tighten up my writing...and I increase my understanding of the topic, as well.
I've found the LLM tools generate bland writing in general but may produce custom/specific insights that help me writer better.
Yes, that reminds me of that which Tom Kerwin uses; one may effectively create ritual dissent (or similar), role play, etc. Good piece of advice; cheers.
Thanks for the insights and tips, JP.
I use a writing tool that allows me to create RAG knowledge bases. I use these knowledge bases to have "experts" critique my writing.
For example, I have a "Dave Snowden" knowledge base where I've cribbed dozens of Dave's YouTube videos. When I'm writing about problem-solving in complex adaptive systems, I may ask the LLM "How might Dave Snowden critique these paragraphs?" or ""How might Dave Snowden clarify this concept?". Usually, I get a useful response that helps me tighten up my writing...and I increase my understanding of the topic, as well.
I've found the LLM tools generate bland writing in general but may produce custom/specific insights that help me writer better.
Yes, that reminds me of that which Tom Kerwin uses; one may effectively create ritual dissent (or similar), role play, etc. Good piece of advice; cheers.